Francine Shapiro Library

Choose any combination of the search options below. If you do not wish to include an option in your search, leave the box blank, or select "Any."


 Your Results - you searched for the keyword IOM 5 Results    

  Sort Results By:

1. Lipke, H. (2007, October 22). Amended response to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) Report of the Committee on Treatment of PTSD, commissioned by the Department of Veteran Affairs. Howard Lipke, Ph.D..

Language: English

Format: Other

Keywords: Amended Response  

Accuracy Verified: Yes

2. EMDR International Association (EMDRIA) (2012, October 7). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing international association response to the Institute of Medicine report on “Treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder in military and veteran populations: Initial assessment”. EMDRIA. Retrieved from http://www.emdria.org/associations/12049/files/EMDRIA%20IOM%20Response.pdf on 10/19/2012.

Language: English

Format: Other

Abstract:
In response to the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) July 2012, publication, Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Military and Veteran Populations: Initial Assessment, the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing International Association (EMDRIA) applauds the IOM for its leadership role in calling for the use of evidence-based methods for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and for advocating stepped-up research on therapies for war stress injuries, with an appropriate recognition of the urgency required.
We do, however, see errors and omissions in the portrayal of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in the IOM reports; we believe that the misrepresentation of EMDR in the 2008 document unfortunately has been perpetuated in the 2012 Initial Assessment. We are concerned that these misunderstandings will be incorporated as Phase 2 of this study proceeds; thus we are providing you with information with the hope that these inaccuracies can be addressed and corrected. This would positively impact further research on the treatment of PTSD. In the following, we have identified several specific statements in the IOM report that misquote or misrepresent the original EMDR research papers. The inaccuracy of the quotes are serious enough to bias the conclusions of the IOM report and call into question the validity of the document.
In addition, we want to highlight the fact that the original IOM report on PTSD called for randomized clinical trials (RCT) to further evaluate EMDR (IOM, 2008), but this recommendation has not been implemented. It is our hope that our response will encourage the IOM to address this lack of follow through and advocate for randomized clinical trials to test the efficacy of all the evidence-based therapies.

Keywords: Institute of Medicine Report  IOM Report  Military  Posttraumatic Stress  PTSD  

Accuracy Verified: Yes

3. Lee, C. W., & Schubert, S. (2009). Omissions and errors in the Institute of Medicine's report on scientific evidence of treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 3(1), 32-38. doi:10.1891/1933-3196.3.1.32.

Language: English

Format: Journal

Abstract:
A recently released report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2008) commissioned by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs examined the evidence for psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It concluded that the evidence was inadequate to determine the efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in the treatment of PTSD. However, a critical examination of the basis for this conclusion reveals errors in three areas. First, the findings of key studies that reported positive outcomes for EMDR were misrepresented; second, a number of positive studies were excluded without apparent justification; and, finally, the IOM report failed to consider additional readily available studies that also reported benefits for EMDR. These factors appear to explain why the conclusions of the IOM report are at odds with the numerous meta-analyses and practice guidelines of PTSD treatments issued by other scientific committees worldwide. [Author abstract]

Keywords: Evidence Based  Institute of Medicine  IOM  Posttraumatic Stress Disorder  PSTD  

Accuracy Verified: Yes

4. Wilkinson, D. S. (2008, March). On PTSD. Monitor on Psychology, 39(3), 4, 8.

Language: English

Format: Magazine

Abstract:
It was disappointing that the Institute of Medicine (IoM) panel findings gave so links coverage to Eye Movement Desensirizacion and Reprocessing (EMDR). As a clinician in private practice who has treated active-duty military personnel, the clear advantage that EMDR has over the other treatments for PTSD is how quickly it works and that it is less painful for the client. Exposure therapy can be excruciating for the client and has a high drop-out rate as a result. Medication for PTSD only treats the symptoms.

Keywords: Letter  

Accuracy Verified: Yes

5. Lee, C. (2008, February). A reply to the Institute of Medicine report commissioned by the Department of Veterans Affairs to assess the scientific evidence on treatment modalities for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). EMDR International Association, Austin, Texas.

Language: English

Format: Other

Abstract:
EMDRIA has submitted comments critical of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report commissioned by the Department of Veterans Affairs to assess the scientific evidence on treatment modalities for PTSD. The 2007 report concluded that “the evidence is inadequate to determine the efficacy of EMDR in the treatment of PTSD.” The response, authored by Dr. Christopher Lee, Research Chair, and reviewed by the Research Committee, details serious omissions and misinterpretations of the scientific literature that would have effected the conclusions about EMDR in the report. Dr. Lee also prepared a PowerPoint presentation for EMDRIA members to use.

Keywords: Efficacy  Letter  Reply  

Accuracy Verified: Yes