Francine Shapiro Library - EMDR Bibliography Links
Choose any combination of the search options below. If you do not wish to include an option in your search, leave the box blank, or select "Any."
Your Results - you searched for the keyword Counterpoint 11 Results
1. Cahill, S. P. (2000, July 1). Counterpoint: Evaluating EMDR in treating PTSD. Psychiatric Times, 17(7), 3-14.
Language: English
Format: Magazine
Abstract:
EMDR: Is Psychiatry Missing the Boat? (point)
EMDR in Treating PTSD (counterpoint)
This discussion focuses on the efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), a highly controversial treatment for patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The point article stresses the extensive body of literature that shows the efficacy and safety of EMDR as a treatment protocol. It also explains the treatment process. The counterpoint article argues that much of the research supporting EMDR may not be methodologically sound and that attempting to make statements of efficacy based on the current literature may not be wise.[Psychiatric Times]
Keywords: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder PTSD Treatment
Accuracy Verified: Yes
2. Joseph, S. A. (2002, May). Counterpoint: Emperor's new clothes?. The Psychologist, 15(5), 242-243.
Language: English
Format: Magazine
Abstract:
Argues that present-day scientific knowledge is inadequate to warrant the existence of a fully developed therapeutic approach based on eye movements or any other dual-attention task.
A comment on: Francine Shapiro and Louise Maxfield, "In the blink of an eye," Psychologist 15(3): 120-124 (March 2002. [Pilots]
Keywords: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Professional Criticism PTSD Treatment
Accuracy Verified: Yes
3. Shapiro, F. (1998, October). EMDR as accelerated information processing therapy: Research and Practice. The California Psychologist, 31(10), 25-27.
Language: English
Format: Magazine
Abstract:
An exchange of views on the efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. [Pilots] ...The California Psychologist, October 1998 Point/Counterpoint Feature: Point:
Shapiro, F. (1998, October). EMDR as accelerated information processing therapy: Research and Practice. The California Psychologist, 31(10), 25-27. Counterpoint: Rosen, G. M., McNally, R. J., Lohr, J. M., Devilly, G. J., Herbert, J. D., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (1998, October). A realistic appraisal of EMDR. The California Psychologist, 31(10), 25, 27....
[Reprinted in: Oregon Psychological Association's Newsgram, 1998, 17, 10-13; Washington Psychologist, 1998, 52, 9-10; Virginia Psychologist, 1999, 42, 11; Massachusetts Psychological Association's Quarterly, 1999, 42, 10-11; Georgia Psychologist, 1999, 53, 25; Missouri Psychologist, 1999, 11 (2), 7-8; Arkansas Psychologist, 1999, 1, 9-10; New York State Psychological Association Notebook, 1999, 11(3),19]
Keywords: Commentary Posttraumatic Stress Disorder PTSD Stressors Survivors Treatment Effectiveness
Accuracy Verified: Yes
4. Shapiro, F. (1997, April). EMDR: Setting the record straight. Contemporary Psychology,APA Review of Books, 42(2), 363-364. doi:10.1037/005088 .
Language: English
Format: Journal
Abstract:
Originally published in Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books, 1997, Vol 42(4), 363-364. Francine Shapiro comments on Jeffrey Lohr's review (see record 2004-17623-008)of Shapiro's book Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols and Procedures (see record 1995-98132-000). The author points out that Lohr has bolstered his argument by citing his own literature reviews, which are also characterized by pervasive misrepresentations of the actual data (Lohr, Kleinknecht, Tolin, & Barrett, 1995; Tolin, Montgomery, Kleinknecht, & Lohr, 1995). In his book review, Lohr questions the interpretations of the research the author gives in the text by saying that "Published accounts that cast doubt on the effect of treatment are ignored or discounted for insubstantial reasons." The author lists four criteria specified in the book for evaluating the clinical applicability of PTSD research results and states that the readers may judge if these criteria are indeed "insubstantial". Contrary to Lohr's implications, the judicious and diverse clinical applications of EMDR explored in the book have been supported by many experts in the field in conjunction with relevant published data. Rather than argue the merits of the proposed Accelerated Information Processing model or review the pervasive errors in Lohr's discussion of it, the author will allow readers to come to their own conclusions. She reaffirms here as she does throughout the text, that debates regarding the model, or the eye movements per se, are not relevant to the question of whether or not the method actually works. EMDR consists of much more than directed eye movements (or alternate stimulation). Rather, it is a complex integrative approach, drawing from psychodynamic, behavioral, cognitive, systems, and body-oriented therapies. More positive controlled studies support EMDR than any other treatment for PTSD (e.g., Carlson, Chemtob, Rusnak, Hedlund, & Muraoka, in press; Rothbaum, in press; Scheck, Schaeffer, & Gillette, in press; Wilson, Becker, Tinker, 1995, in press; Shapiro, 1996b). All of these studies fulfill accepted standards of objective psychometrics and independent assessors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved).
Keywords: Lohr Point/Counterpoint
Accuracy Verified: Yes
5. Rosen, G. M., McNally, R. J., Lohr, J. M., Devilly, G. J., Herbert, J. D., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (1998, October). A realistic appraisal of EMDR. The California Psychologist, 31(10), 25, 27.
Language: English
Format: Magazine
Abstract:
An exchange of views on the efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. [Pilots]...The California Psychologist, October 1998 Point/Counterpoint Feature: Point:
Shapiro, F. (1998, October). EMDR as accelerated information processing therapy: Research and Practice. The California Psychologist, 31(10), 25-27. Counterpoint: Rosen, G. M., McNally, R. J., Lohr, J. M., Devilly, G. J., Herbert, J. D., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (1998, October). A realistic appraisal of EMDR. The California Psychologist, 31(10), 25, 27....[Reprinted in: Oregon Psychological Association's Newsgram, 1998, 17, 10-13; Washington Psychologist, 1998, 52, 9-10; Virginia Psychologist, 1999, 42, 11; Massachusetts Psychological Association's Quarterly, 1999, 42, 10-11; Georgia Psychologist, 1999, 53, 25; Missouri Psychologist, 1999, 11 (2), 7-8; Arkansas Psychologist, 1999, 1, 9-10; New York State Psychological Association Notebook, 1999, 11(3),19]
Keywords: Commentary Posttraumatic Stress Disorder PTSD Stressors Survivors Treatment Effectiveness
Accuracy Verified: Yes
6. Spector, J. (2002, July). Support for EMDR: 'Counterpoint: Emperor's new clothes?': Comment. The Psychologist, 15(7), 335-336.
Language: English
Format: Journal
Abstract:
Addresses S. Joseph's critical commentary on the original article by F. Shapiro and L. Maxfield which reported on the efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy (EMDR). The current author offers support for EMDR, disputing the validity of Joseph's claims that EMDR lacks the appropriate evidence (in regards to its efficacy) necessary for its professional acceptance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved).
Keywords: Counterpoint Emperor Letter
Accuracy Verified: Yes
7. van der Kolk, B. A., & Shapiro, F. (2009, December). Trauma. Point/Counterpoint speech at the 6th Evolution of Psychotherapy Conference, Anaheim, CA.
Language: English
Format: Conference
Abstract: Dialogue 1
Keywords: Point Counterpoint
Accuracy Verified: Yes
8. Fernandez, I., Maslovaric, G., & Galvagni, M. V. (2011). Traumi psicologici, ferite dell'anima: Il contributo della terapia con EMDR [Psychological trauma, wounds of the soul: The contribution of EMDR therapy]. Milano, Italy: Liguori.
Language: Italian
Format: Book
Abstract:
I traumi, le ferite – del corpo o dell’anima che siano – nella vita non possono non accadere. Questo libro permette di avere una conoscenza colta, approfondita, attraverso una lettura piacevole ed agile, del trauma psicologico nell’adulto e nell’infanzia: sia di quello personale, sia di quello derivante da eventi catastrofici, portando a una conoscenza utile per aiutare il superamento naturale dei traumi più lievi, ma anche per riconoscere e indirizzare al trattamento clinico di eccellenza dei traumi maggiori. Gli autori dedicano il contrappunto finale al “Trauma nell’arte pittorica”, una breve e interessante panoramica di come alcuni celebri artisti hanno trattato/ritratto il trauma.
The traumas, wounds - the body or the soul that are - in life can not fail to happen. This book allows you to have a knowledge of intelligent, thorough, through an enjoyable read and agile, the psychological trauma in adulthood and childhood: both the staff, both those resulting from catastrophic events, leading to useful knowledge to help the overcoming natural milder trauma, but also to recognize and address the clinical treatment of major trauma of excellence. The authors devote the final counterpoint to the "Trauma in pictorial art," a brief and interesting overview of how some famous artists have treated / portrayed the trauma.
Keywords: Trauma
Accuracy Verified: Yes
9. Rothbaum, B. O., & Hyer, L. (1993, September). Treating trauma victims through eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. Violence Update: Dedicated to the Continuing Education of the Professionals in the Field of Interpersonal Violence, 4(1), 5-6, 8, 10.
Language: English
Format: Journal
Abstract:
Point/Counterpoint: Not surprisingly, there has been a high level of controversy surrounding the use and effectiveness of this proceedure. Two professionals who are experienced in the implication of EMDR describe the intervention in greater detail and offer their differing perspectives on its use and potential effectiveness.
Keywords: Treatment
Accuracy Verified: Yes
10. Greenwald, R., & Shapiro, F. (2011). What Is EMDR? Concluding Commentary by Greenwald and Response by Shapiro. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 5(1), 2-13. doi:10.1891/1933-3196.5.1.25.
Language: English
Format: Journal
Abstract:
This Point/Counterpoint concludes the interchange in Greenwald, R. and Shapiro, F. (2010) What is EMDR?: Commentary by Greenwald and Invited Response by Shapiro Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 4, 170-179. Greenwald Rejoinder: In this rejoinder, I highlight areas of agreement between Shapiro and me that were obscured by Shapiro's (2010) response to my (Greenwald, 2010) commentary. I also address some of the erroneous statements made by Shapiro (2010) in her arguments against my positions. Finally, I summarize our disagreements, and again assert that until we have an empirical basis for preferring a particular theoretical model of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), it is premature for professional organizations to endorse Shapiro's model. Shapiro Response: In response to Greenwald, I again confine myself to addressing some of the errors and misconceptions in his arguments in relation to important aspects of EMDR therapy, theory, and research. Further, contrary to his assertion, there is already a sufficient empirical basis to support the preferential use of the adaptive information processing (AIP) model from which the EMDR procedures were formulated. His argument against this position is antithetical to the traditional process by which foundational models are challenged, refined, or replaced. Implications are salient to both training and practice.
Keywords: Adaptive Information Processing AIP Model Psychotherapy Research
Accuracy Verified: Yes
11. Shapiro, F. (1993, Spring). Whence EMDR? Commentary. EMDR Network Newsletter, 3(1), 18-19.
Language: English
Format: Newsletter
Abstract:
Dr. Silver asked me to comment on his submission. Rather than attempt to make this a “counterpoint,” I would like to share the thoughts that reading it has engendered. This is in no way to be considered a definitive statement. Dr. Silver’s article is quite provocative and of great service and if EMDR is to thrive, it is essential that trained EMDR practitioners maintain a stance of on-going scrutiny and diversity.
Keywords: Response
Accuracy Verified: Yes